Research Repository

Getting "Just Deserts" or seeing the "Silver Lining": The relation between judgments of immanent and ultimate justice

Harvey, AJ and Callan, MJ (2014) 'Getting "Just Deserts" or seeing the "Silver Lining": The relation between judgments of immanent and ultimate justice.' PLoS ONE, 9 (7). ISSN 1932-6203

[img]
Preview
Text
journal.pone.0101803.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (411kB) | Preview

Abstract

People can perceive misfortunes as caused by previous bad deeds (immanent justice reasoning) or resulting in ultimate compensation (ultimate justice reasoning). Across two studies, we investigated the relation between these types of justice reasoning and identified the processes (perceptions of deservingness) that underlie them for both others (Study 1) and the self (Study 2). Study 1 demonstrated that observers engaged in more ultimate (vs. immanent) justice reasoning for a "good" victim and greater immanent (vs. ultimate) justice reasoning for a "bad" victim. In Study 2, participants' construals of their bad breaks varied as a function of their self-worth, with greater ultimate (immanent) justice reasoning for participants with higher (lower) self-esteem. Across both studies, perceived deservingness of bad breaks or perceived deservingness of ultimate compensation mediated immanent and ultimate justice reasoning respectively. © 2014 Harvey and Callan.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of
Depositing User: Jim Jamieson
Date Deposited: 12 Sep 2014 08:50
Last Modified: 05 Feb 2019 18:16
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/10101

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item