Research Repository

Significance and value of non-traded ecosystem services on farmland

Sandhu, H and Wratten, S and Costanza, R and Pretty, J and Porter, JR and Reganold, J (2015) 'Significance and value of non-traded ecosystem services on farmland.' PeerJ, 2015 (2). ISSN 2167-8359

peerj-762.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (830kB) | Preview
[img] Text (Supplemental Information 1)
Supplementary_Information_CleanCopy_14Jan2015.docx - Supplemental Material

Download (37kB)
[img] Text (The regions and countries used in this analysis, total arable area, area under four crops (PBBW; peas, beans, barley and wheat) and their levels of production. Million hectare (M Ha), Million Tonnes (M Tonnes).)
Table_S1.docx - Supplemental Material

Download (110kB)
[img] Text (Cropping history, pH, bulk density, total C and N in 10 organic (Org) and 10 conventional (Cnv) fields.)
Table_S2.docx - Supplemental Material

Download (63kB)
[img] Text (The mean economic value of biological control of pests and N mineralisation, yield and ratio of ES to yield under conventional and organic arable fields in New Zealand.)
Table_S3.docx - Supplemental Material

Download (44kB)
[img] Text (Total temperate arable land, inputs, outputs, economic value of target crops (PBBW; peas, beans, barley and wheat), and economic value of two key ecosystem services in 15 global regions (see text for details): Biological control value for organic fields o)
Table_S4.docx - Supplemental Material

Download (82kB)


Background. Ecosystem services (ES) generated within agricultural landscapes, including field boundaries, are vital for the sustainable supply of food and fibre. However, the value of ES in agriculture has not been quantified experimentally and then extrapolated globally. Methods. We quantified the economic value of two key but contrasting ES (biological control of pests and nitrogen mineralisation) provided by non-traded non-crop species in ten organic and ten conventional arable fields in New Zealand using field experiments. The arable crops grown, same for each organic and conventional pair, were peas (Pisum sativum), beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), barley (Hordeum vulgare), and wheat (Triticum aestivum). Organic systems were chosen as comparators not because they are the only forms of sustainable agriculture, but because they are subject to easily understood standards. Results. We found that organic farming systems depended on fewer external inputs and produced outputs of energy and crop dry matter generally less than but sometimes similar to those of their conventional counterparts. The economic values of the two selected ES were greater for the organic systems in all four crops, ranging from US$ 68-200 ha<sup>-1</sup> yr<sup>-1</sup> for biological control of pests and from US$ 110-425 ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup> for N mineralisation in the organic systems versus US$ 0 ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup> for biological control of pests and from US$ 60-244 ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup> for N mineralisation in the conventional systems. The total economic value (including market and non-market components) was significantly greater in organic systems, ranging from US$ 1750-4536 ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup>, with US$ 1585-2560 ha<sup>-1</sup>yr<sup>-1</sup> in the conventional systems. The non-market component of the economic value in organic fields was also significantly higher than those in conventional fields. Discussion. To illustrate the potential magnitude of these two ES to temperate farming systems and agricultural landscapes elsewhere, we then extrapolate these experimentally derived figures to the global temperate cropping area of the same arable crops. We found that the extrapolated net value of the these two services provided by non-traded species could exceed the combined current global costs of pesticide and fertiliser inputs, even if utilised on only 10% of the global arable area. This approach strengthens the case for ES-rich agricultural systems, provided by non-traded species to global agriculture.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences
S Agriculture > S Agriculture (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Life Sciences, School of
Depositing User: Jim Jamieson
Date Deposited: 23 Feb 2015 13:55
Last Modified: 07 Apr 2021 10:15

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item