Research Repository

Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning

Sirota, M and Juanchich, M and Hagmayer, Y (2014) 'Ecological rationality or nested sets? Individual differences in cognitive processing predict Bayesian reasoning.' Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 21 (1). 198 - 204. ISSN 1069-9384

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The presentation of a Bayesian inference problem in terms of natural frequencies rather than probabilities has been shown to enhance performance. The effect of individual differences in cognitive processing on Bayesian reasoning has rarely been studied, despite enabling us to test process-oriented variants of the two main accounts of the facilitative effect of natural frequencies: The ecological rationality account (ERA), which postulates an evolutionarily shaped ease of natural frequency automatic processing, and the nested sets account (NSA), which posits analytical processing of nested sets. In two experiments, we found that cognitive reflection abilities predicted normative performance equally well in tasks featuring whole and arbitrarily parsed objects (Experiment 1) and that cognitive abilities and thinking dispositions (analytical vs. intuitive) predicted performance with single-event probabilities, as well as natural frequencies (Experiment 2). Since these individual differences indicate that analytical processing improves Bayesian reasoning, our findings provide stronger support for the NSA than for the ERA. © 2013 Psychonomic Society, Inc.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of
Depositing User: Jim Jamieson
Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2015 14:57
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2019 16:22
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/14986

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item