Research Repository

Death and Deliberation: Overcoming the Decisionism Critique of Heidegger's Practical Philosophy

Burch, M (2010) 'Death and Deliberation: Overcoming the Decisionism Critique of Heidegger's Practical Philosophy.' Inquiry, 53 (3). 211 - 234. ISSN 0020-174X

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This paper defends Heidegger?s account of resolute self-choice against the ubiquitous Decisionism Critique [DC]. According to DC, Heidegger?s discussion of resoluteness commits him to an indefensible position in which resolute Dasein is said to choose who it will be without recourse to any reasons or evaluative standards. In response, I argue that DC is based on a misunderstanding of some of the key arguments of Being and Time. I then offer an alternative portrait of Heidegger?s account of resolute self-choice and argue that such choice will involve both 1) the consideration of factical claims as reasons that count in favor of a particular way of life and 2) the evaluation of these reasons in light of at least three deliberative standards. Thus, I argue that DC is misguided and needs to be replaced by an interpretation rooted in a more complete understanding of Heidegger?s project.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities > Philosophy and Art History, School of
Depositing User: Users 161 not found.
Date Deposited: 30 Jun 2017 12:55
Last Modified: 17 Aug 2017 17:32
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/15004

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item