Freyenhagen, F and Schaub, J (2010) 'Did anyone here say that the emperor is naked? A defense of Geuss' criticism of Rawls' ideal theory approach.' Deutsche Zeitschrift fur Philosophie, 58 (3). 457 - 477. ISSN 0012-1045

Preview

PDF DZPhil_Beitrag_zu_Geuss_von_Schaub_Freyenhagen.pdf Download (558kB) | Preview

Abstract

In this paper, we take up two objections Raymond Geuss levels against John Rawls' ideal theory in Philosophy and Real Politics. We show that, despite their fundamental disagreements, the two theorists share a common starting point: they both (a) reject doing political philosophy by way of applying an independently derived moral theory; and (b) grapple with the danger of unduly privileging the status quo. However, neither Rawls' characterization of politics nor his ideal theoretical approach as response to the aforementioned danger is adequate - or so we argue. Moreover, contrary to received opinion, Geuss' political philosophy is the more reflective and the more philosophical of the two. In a final section, we highlight another agreement: both think that political philosophers should develop conceptual innovations as a way of clarifying and overcoming practical problems. We demonstrate that Geuss could offer a number of reasons for finding Rawls' conceptual innovations wanting.

Item Type:	Article
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Humanities > Philosophy and Art History, School of
Depositing User:	Jim Jamieson
Date Deposited:	01 Dec 2011 13:12
Last Modified:	22 Jan 2019 22:16
URI:	http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/1694

Actions (login required)

View Item