Research Repository

How to improve people's interpretation of probabilities of precipitation

Juanchich, M and Sirota, M (2016) 'How to improve people's interpretation of probabilities of precipitation.' Journal of Risk Research, 19 (3). 388 - 404. ISSN 1366-9877

[img]
Preview
Text
Juanchich and Sirota_Accepted_manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (360kB) | Preview

Abstract

© 2014 Taylor & Francis. Most research into uncertainty focuses on how people estimate probability magnitude. By contrast, this paper focuses on how people interpret the concept of probability and why they often misinterpret it. In a weather forecast context, we hypothesised that the absence of an explicit reference class and the polysemy of the percentage format are causing incorrect probability interpretations, and test two interventions to help people make better probability interpretation. In two studies (N = 1337), we demonstrate that most people from the UK and the US do not interpret probabilities of precipitation correctly. The explicit mention of the reference class helped people to interpret probabilities of precipitation better when the target area was explicit; but this was not the case when it was not specified. Furthermore, the polysemy of the percentage format is not likely to cause these misinterpretations, since a non-polysemous format (e.g. verbal probability) did not facilitate a correct probability interpretation in our studies. A Bayes factor analysis supported both of these conclusions. We discuss theoretical and applied implications of our findings.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of
Depositing User: Marie Juanchich
Date Deposited: 23 Jun 2016 13:52
Last Modified: 30 Jan 2019 16:22
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/17012

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item