Research Repository

Were We Really All in it Together? The Distributional Effects of the 2010-15 UK Coalition Government's Tax-benefit Policy Changes

De Agostini, P and Hills, J and Sutherland, H (2017) 'Were We Really All in it Together? The Distributional Effects of the 2010-15 UK Coalition Government's Tax-benefit Policy Changes.' Social Policy and Administration. ISSN 0144-5596

[img] Text
In it together SPA submission_all Essex.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 6 September 2019.

Download (825kB) | Request a copy

Abstract

This article examines the distributional impacts of changes to benefits, tax credits, pensions and direct taxes between the UK general elections of May 2010 and May 2015. The changes did not have a common effect on all household incomes; nor did the direct tax-benefit changes contribute to deficit reduction. Effectively, reductions in benefits and tax credits financed part of the direct taxes cuts, but the overall net fiscal cost increased pressure for cuts in other public services and increases in other (more regressive) taxes. The main gains were in the upper middle of the income distribution, and the main losers were at the bottom and those close to, but not at, the very top. Across most of the distribution the changes were regressive. By comparing with other analyses of policy changes in the same period, we illustrate the importance of analytical choices and assumptions for detailed conclusions on their distributional effects. We also show how some groups were clear losers or gained little on average – including lone parent families, large families and families with younger children. Others were gainers, including two-earner couples, and those in their fifties and early sixties. The findings show that a dominant feature of the period was that the combination of higher tax-free income tax allowances, financed by cuts in benefits and tax credits, was generally regressive. As this combination also lies at the heart of the proposed policies of the Conservative government since 2015, we would expect these effects to be intensified in the coming years.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Income distribution; Direct taxes; Social security; United Kingdom; Coalition government
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HJ Public Finance
H Social Sciences > HN Social history and conditions. Social problems. Social reform
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research
Depositing User: Holly Sutherland
Date Deposited: 12 Jul 2017 09:21
Last Modified: 23 Jan 2018 12:15
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/20059

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item