Research Repository

‘Ought implies Can’ and the law

Fox, C and Feis, G (2017) '‘Ought implies Can’ and the law.' Inquiry. ISSN 0020-174X

[img] Text
paper-edited-30mar2017-6Nov17.pdf - Accepted Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 10 March 2019.

Download (265kB)


In this paper, we investigate the ‘ought implies can’ (OIC) thesis, focusing on explanations and interpretations of OIC, with a view to clarifying its uses and relevance to legal philosophy. We first review various issues concerning the semantics and pragmatics of OIC; then we consider how OIC may be incorporated in Hartian and Kelsenian theories of the law. Along the way we also propose a taxonomy of OIC-related claims.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Ought implies can, OIC, meta-norms, iterated modalities, law, legal drafting, pragmatics, semantics, Kelsen, Hart, von Wright
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, School of
Depositing User: Elements
Date Deposited: 30 Nov 2017 11:26
Last Modified: 30 Nov 2017 11:26

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item