Research Repository

Derogating Innocent Victims: The Effects of Relative Versus Absolute Character Judgments

Dawtry, Rael J and Callan, Mitchell J and Harvey, Annelie J and Olson, James M (2018) 'Derogating Innocent Victims: The Effects of Relative Versus Absolute Character Judgments.' Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44 (2). pp. 186-199. ISSN 0146-1672

Harvey_2017.pdf - Accepted Version

Download (405kB) | Preview


Drawing on just-world theory and research into the suppression and justification of prejudice, we propose that the use of relative compared with absolute measures of an innocent victim’s character enables observers to derogate the victim without transparently violating social norms or values proscribing derogation. In Study 1, we found that positive feelings expressed toward victims mirrored social norms proscribing negative reactions toward them. In Studies 2a, 2b, and 3, innocent victims were evaluated more negatively when ratings were made using relative (i.e., compared with evaluations of the average student or the self) versus absolute scales. In Study 4, this effect of scale type on derogation was stronger for people higher in the motivation to avoid prejudiced reactions to victims. Relative judgments seem to allow individuals to enact their counternormative motivation to derogate the victim under the cover of ambiguity and ostensibly rationally motivated social comparison processes.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: victim derogation, social norms, social comparison, relative measures, prejudice
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health
Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of
SWORD Depositor: Elements
Depositing User: Elements
Date Deposited: 04 Dec 2018 10:31
Last Modified: 06 Jan 2022 13:42

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item