Research Repository

The CORE Service Improvement Programme for mental health crisis resolution teams: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial

Lloyd-Evans, Brynmor and Fullarton, Kate and Lamb, Danielle and Johnston, Elaine and Onyett, Steve and Osborn, David and Ambler, Gareth and Marston, Louise and Hunter, Rachael and Mason, Oliver and Henderson, Claire and Goater, Nicky and Sullivan, Sarah A and Kelly, Kathleen and Gray, Richard and Nolan, Fiona and Pilling, Stephen and Bond, Gary and Johnson, Sonia (2016) 'The CORE Service Improvement Programme for mental health crisis resolution teams: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.' Trials, 17 (1). ISSN 1745-6215

[img]
Preview
Text
The CORE Service Improvement Programme for mental health crisis resolution teams: study protocol for a cluster-randomised controlled trial.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (523kB) | Preview

Abstract

Background As an alternative to hospital admission, crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide intensive home treatment to people experiencing mental health crises. Trial evidence supports the effectiveness of the CRT model, but research suggests that the anticipated reductions in inpatient admissions and increased user satisfaction with acute care have been less than hoped for following the scaling up of CRTs nationally in England, as mandated by the National Health Service (NHS) Plan in 2000. The organisation and service delivery of the CRTs vary substantially. This may reflect the lack of a fully specified CRT model and the resources to enhance team model fidelity and to improve service quality. We will evaluate the impact of a CRT service improvement programme over a 1-year period on the service users’ experiences of care, service use, staff well-being, and team model fidelity. Methods/design Twenty-five CRTs from eight NHS Trusts across England will be recruited to this cluster-randomised trial: 15 CRTs will be randomised to receive the service improvement programme over a 1-year period, and ten CRTs will not receive the programme. Data will be collected from 15 service users and all clinical staff from each participating CRT at baseline and at the end of the intervention. Service use data will be collected from the services’ electronic records systems for two 6-month periods: the period preceding and the period during months 7-12 of the intervention. The study’s primary outcome is service user satisfaction with CRT care, measured using a client satisfaction questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include the following: perceived continuity of care, hospital admission rates and bed use, rates of readmission to acute care following CRT support, staff morale, job satisfaction, and general health. The adherence of the services to a model of best practice will be assessed at baseline and follow-up. Outcomes will be compared between the intervention and control teams, adjusting for baseline differences and participant characteristics using linear random effects modelling. Qualitative investigations with participating CRT managers and staff and programme facilitators will explore the experiences of the service improvement programme. Discussion Our trial will show whether a theoretically underpinned and clearly defined package of resources are effective in supporting service improvement and improving outcomes for mental health crisis resolution teams. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN47185233

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: Crisis resolution teams, Acute care, Service improvement, Randomised controlled trial
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA790 Mental Health
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of
Depositing User: Elements
Date Deposited: 12 Mar 2019 16:36
Last Modified: 12 Mar 2019 16:36
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/24075

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item