Research Repository

Crisis resolution and home treatment in the UK: A survey of model fidelity using a novel review methodology

Lamb, Danielle and Lloyd‐Evans, Brynmor and Fullarton, Kate and Kelly, Kathleen and Goater, Nicky and Mason, Oliver and Gray, Richard and Osborn, David and Nolan, Fiona and Pilling, Steve and Sullivan, Sarah A and Henderson, Claire and Milton, Alyssa and Burgess, Emma and Churchard, Alasdair and Davidson, Mike and Frerichs, Johanna and Hindle, David and Paterson, Beth and Brown, Ellie and Piotrowski, Jonathan and Wheeler, Claire and Johnson, Sonia (2020) 'Crisis resolution and home treatment in the UK: A survey of model fidelity using a novel review methodology.' International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 29 (2). 187 - 201. ISSN 1324-3780

Full text not available from this repository. (Request a copy)

Abstract

Crisis resolution teams (CRTs) provide treatment at home to people experiencing mental health crises, as an alternative to hospital admission. Previous UK research, based on self‐report surveys, suggests that a loosely specified model has resulted in wide variations in CRTs’ service delivery, organization and outcomes. A fidelity scale (developed through evidence review and stakeholder consensus) provided a means of objectively measuring adherence to a model of good practice for CRTs, via one‐day fidelity reviews of UK crisis teams. Reviews included interviews with service users, carers, staff and managers, and examination of data, policies, protocols and anonymized case notes. Of the 75 teams reviewed, 49 (65%) were assessed as being moderate fidelity and the rest as low fidelity, with no team achieving high fidelity. The median score was 122 (range: 73–151; inter‐quartile range: 111–132). Teams achieved higher scores on items about structure and organization, for example ease of referral, medication and safety systems, but scored poorly on items about the content of care and interventions. Despite a national mandate to implement the CRT model, there are wide variations in implementation in the UK and no teams in our sample achieved overall high fidelity. This suggests that a mandatory national policy is not in itself sufficient to achieve good quality implementation of a service model. The CRT Fidelity Scale provides a feasible and acceptable means to objectively assess model fidelity in CRTs. There is a need for development and testing of interventions to enhance model fidelity and facilitate improvements to these services.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: clinical audit; crisis intervention; cross-sectional survey; mental health; patient participation; model fidelity; crisis resolution team
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of
Depositing User: Elements
Date Deposited: 15 Jun 2020 14:29
Last Modified: 15 Jun 2020 14:29
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/25545

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item