Research Repository

An Empirical Comparison of Human Value Models

Hanel, Paul HP and Litzellachner, Lukas F and Maio, Gregory R (2018) 'An Empirical Comparison of Human Value Models.' Frontiers in Psychology, 9. ISSN 1664-1078

[img]
Preview
Text
Hanel2018_An Empirical Comparison of Human Value Models.pdf - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

Over the past century, various value models have been proposed. To determine which value model best predicts prosocial behavior, mental health, and pro-environmental behavior, we subjected seven value models to a hierarchical regression analysis. A sample of University students (N = 271) completed the Portrait Value Questionnaire (Schwartz et al., 2012), the Basic Value Survey (Gouveia et al., 2008), and the Social Value Orientation scale (Van Lange et al., 1997). Additionally, they completed the Values Survey Module (Hofstede and Minkov, 2013), Inglehart's (1977) materialism-postmaterialism items, the Study of Values, fourth edition (Allport et al., 1960; Kopelman et al., 2003), and the Rokeach (1973) Value Survey. However, because the reliability of the latter measures was low, only the PVQ-RR, the BVS, and the SVO where entered into our analysis. Our results provide empirical evidence that the PVQ-RR is the strongest predictor of all three outcome variables, explaining variance above and beyond the other two instruments in almost all cases. The BVS significantly predicted prosocial and pro-environmental behavior, while the SVO only explained variance in pro-environmental behavior.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: human values, altruistic behavior, general health behavior, pro-environmental behavior, cultural values
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of
Depositing User: Elements
Date Deposited: 05 Feb 2020 15:09
Last Modified: 05 Feb 2020 16:15
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/26644

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item