Research Repository

Ought but Cannot

Martin, Wayne (2009) 'Ought but Cannot.' Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 109 (1pt2). pp. 103-128. ISSN 0066-7374

This is the latest version of this item.

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

I assess a series of arguments intended to show that ‘ought’ implies ‘can’. Two are rooted in uses of ‘ought’ in contexts of deliberation and command. A third draws on the distinctive resources of deontic logic. I show that, in each case, the arguments leave scope for forms of infinite moral consciousness—forms of moral consciousness in which a moral obligation retains its authority even in the face of the conviction that the obligation is impossible to fulfil. In this respect the paper sides with Martin Luther against Erasmus and Kant.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities
Faculty of Humanities > Philosophy and Art History, School of
SWORD Depositor: Elements
Depositing User: Elements
Date Deposited: 14 Sep 2021 12:42
Last Modified: 06 Jan 2022 13:26
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/31087

Available Versions of this Item

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item