Research Repository

Turn designation, sampling rate and the misidentification of power laws in movement path data using maximum likelihood estimates

Codling, EA and Plank, MJ (2011) 'Turn designation, sampling rate and the misidentification of power laws in movement path data using maximum likelihood estimates.' Theoretical Ecology, 4 (3). 397 - 406. ISSN 1874-1738

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Many authors have claimed to observe animal movement paths that appear to be Lévy walks, i. e. a random walk where the distribution of move lengths follows an inverse power law. A Lévy walk is known to be the optimal search strategy of a particular class of random walks in certain environments; hence, it is important to distinguish correctly between Lévy walks and other types of random walks in observed animal movement paths. Evidence of a power law distribution in the step length distribution of observed animal movement paths is often used to classify a particular movement path as a Lévy walk. However, there is some doubt about the accuracy of early studies that apparently found Lévy walk behaviour. A recently accepted method to determine whether a movement path truly exhibits Lévy walk behaviour is based on an analysis of move lengths with a maximum likelihood estimate using Akaike weights. Here, we show that simulated (non-Lévy) random walks representing different types of animal movement behaviour (a composite correlated random walk; pooled data from a set of random walks with different levels of correlation and three-dimensional correlated random walks projected into one dimension) can all show apparent power law behaviour typical of Lévy walks when using the maximum likelihood estimation method. The probability of the movement path being identified as having a power law step distribution is related to both the sampling rate used by the observer and the way that 'turns' or 'reorientations' in the movement path are designated. However, identification is also dependent on the nature and properties of the simulated path, and there is currently no standard method of observation and analysis that is robust for all cases. Our results indicate that even apparently robust maximum likelihood methods can lead to a mismatch between pattern and process, as paths arising from non-Lévy walks exhibit Lévy-like patterns. © 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

Item Type: Article
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Divisions: Faculty of Science and Health > Mathematical Sciences, Department of
Depositing User: Edward Codling
Date Deposited: 26 Sep 2011 13:39
Last Modified: 05 Feb 2019 19:15
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/783

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item