Matthews, William J and Dylman, Alexandra S (2014) 'The language of magnitude comparison.' Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143 (2). pp. 510-520. ISSN 0096-3445
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
When 2 objects differ in magnitude, their relation can be described with a “smaller” comparative (e.g., less, shorter, lower) or a “larger” comparative (e.g., more, taller, higher). We show that, across multiple dimensions and tasks, English speakers preferentially use the latter. In sentence completion tasks, this higher use of larger comparatives (HULC) effect is more pronounced when the larger item is presented on the left (for simultaneous presentation) or second (for sequential presentation). The HULC effect is not diminished by making the 2 items more similar, but it is somewhat lessened when both objects are of low magnitude. These results illuminate the processes underlying the judgment and representation of relative magnitudes.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | comparative judgment, language, magnitude comparison |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Elements |
Depositing User: | Elements |
Date Deposited: | 01 May 2014 09:16 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2022 14:21 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/9305 |
Actions (login required)
![]() |
View Item |