ARNOLD, DOUG (2007) Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (2). pp. 271-309. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226707004586
ARNOLD, DOUG (2007) Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (2). pp. 271-309. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226707004586
ARNOLD, DOUG (2007) Non-restrictive relatives are not orphans. Journal of Linguistics, 43 (2). pp. 271-309. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022226707004586
Abstract
<jats:p>According to a ‘radical orphanage’ approach, non-restrictive relative clauses are not part of the syntactic representation of the sentence that contains them. It is an appealing view, and seems to capture some important properties of non-restrictive relative clauses. Focusing mainly on empirical shortcomings, this paper aims to show that the appeal of such approaches is illusory. It also outlines an empirically superior ‘syntactically integrated’ account.</jats:p>
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Language and Linguistics, Department of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 11 Dec 2014 15:15 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Oct 2024 05:31 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/11446 |