Borsley, RD (2005) Les coordinations relevant-elles de la syntaxe X-barre? Langages, 39 (160). pp. 25-41. DOI https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.2005.2641
Borsley, RD (2005) Les coordinations relevant-elles de la syntaxe X-barre? Langages, 39 (160). pp. 25-41. DOI https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.2005.2641
Borsley, RD (2005) Les coordinations relevant-elles de la syntaxe X-barre? Langages, 39 (160). pp. 25-41. DOI https://doi.org/10.3406/lgge.2005.2641
Abstract
<jats:p>Robert D, Borsley: Coordination and X-bar Syntax. </jats:p> <jats:p>It is widely accepted within Principles and Parameters theory that coordinate structures are Conjunction Phrases, in which the first term is the specifier, the conjunction the head, and the second </jats:p> <jats:p>term the complement. They differ from typical specifier-head-complement structures in various ways. so at most they could be exceptional instances of such structures. A consideration of the distribution </jats:p> <jats:p>of coordinate structures, the number of conjuncts (or terms), the nature of conjuncts (or terms), and </jats:p> <jats:p>the basic structure of coordinate structures suggests that there are no significant similarilies between </jats:p> <jats:p>coordinate structures and specifier-head-complement structures and a consideration of certain </jats:p> <jats:p>unbalanced coordinate structures points to the same conclusion. It seems, then, that the Conjunction Phrase analysis is untenable.</jats:p>
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Language and Linguistics, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jun 2015 12:42 |
Last Modified: | 06 Dec 2024 01:10 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/11493 |
Available files
Filename: article_lgge_0458-726x_2005_num_39_160_2641.pdf