Akama, H and Murphy, B and Lei, M and Poesio, M (2014) Cross-participant modelling based on joint or disjoint feature selection: an fMRI conceptual decoding study. Applied Informatics, 1 (1). creators-Poesio=3AMassimo=3A=3A.
Akama, H and Murphy, B and Lei, M and Poesio, M (2014) Cross-participant modelling based on joint or disjoint feature selection: an fMRI conceptual decoding study. Applied Informatics, 1 (1). creators-Poesio=3AMassimo=3A=3A.
Akama, H and Murphy, B and Lei, M and Poesio, M (2014) Cross-participant modelling based on joint or disjoint feature selection: an fMRI conceptual decoding study. Applied Informatics, 1 (1). creators-Poesio=3AMassimo=3A=3A.
Abstract
Multivariate classification techniques have proven to be powerful tools for distinguishing experimental conditions in single sessions of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data. But they are vulnerable to a considerable penalty in classification accuracy when applied across sessions or participants, calling into question the degree to which fine-grained encodings are shared across subjects. Here, we introduce joint learning techniques, where feature selection is carried out using a held-out subset of a target dataset, before training a linear classifier on a source dataset. Single trials of functional MRI data from a covert property generation task are classified with regularized regression techniques to predict the semantic class of stimuli. With our selection techniques (joint ranking feature selection (JRFS) and disjoint feature selection (DJFS)), classification performance during cross-session prediction improved greatly, relative to feature selection on the source session data only. Compared with JRFS, DJFS showed significant improvements for cross-participant classification. And when using a groupwise training, DJFS approached the accuracies seen for prediction across different sessions from the same participant. Comparing several feature selection strategies, we found that a simple univariate ANOVA selection technique or a minimal searchlight (one voxel in size) is appropriate, compared with larger searchlights.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | FMRI; MVPA; Machine learning; Feature selection; Cross-session; Cross-subject |
Subjects: | P Language and Literature > P Philology. Linguistics Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 04 Dec 2014 17:11 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 18:46 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/11999 |
Available files
Filename: 2196-0089-1-1.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0