Cameron, Tom C and O'Sullivan, Daniel and Reynolds, Alan and Hicks, Joseph P and Piertney, Stuart B and Benton, Tim G (2016) Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments. Ecology and Evolution, 6 (12). pp. 4179-4191. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164
Cameron, Tom C and O'Sullivan, Daniel and Reynolds, Alan and Hicks, Joseph P and Piertney, Stuart B and Benton, Tim G (2016) Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments. Ecology and Evolution, 6 (12). pp. 4179-4191. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164
Cameron, Tom C and O'Sullivan, Daniel and Reynolds, Alan and Hicks, Joseph P and Piertney, Stuart B and Benton, Tim G (2016) Harvested populations are more variable only in more variable environments. Ecology and Evolution, 6 (12). pp. 4179-4191. DOI https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2164
Abstract
The interaction between environmental variation and population dynamics is of major importance, particularly for managed and economically important species, and especially given contemporary changes in climate variability. Recent analyses of exploited animal populations contested whether exploitation or environmental variation has the greatest influence on the stability of population dynamics, with consequences for variation in yield and extinction risk. Theoretical studies however have shown that harvesting can increase or decrease population variability depending on environmental variation, and requested controlled empirical studies to test predictions. Here, we use an invertebrate model species in experimental microcosms to explore the interaction between selective harvesting and environmental variation in food availability in affecting the variability of stage‐structured animal populations over 20 generations. In a constant food environment, harvesting adults had negligible impact on population variability or population size, but in the variable food environments, harvesting adults increased population variability and reduced its size. The impact of harvesting on population variability differed between proportional and threshold harvesting, between randomly and periodically varying environments, and at different points of the time series. Our study suggests that predicting the responses to selective harvesting is sensitive to the demographic structures and processes that emerge in environments with different patterns of environmental variation.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Age-truncation, density dependence,environment, harvesting, microcosm,mortality, population dynamics, predation,seasonality, stage-structure, threshold,variability |
Subjects: | G Geography. Anthropology. Recreation > GE Environmental Sciences |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Life Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 26 May 2016 11:05 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 19:57 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/16795 |
Available files
Filename: Cameron_et_al-2016-Ecology_and_Evolution.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0