Open Science Collaboration and Sandstrom, GM (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251). creators-Sandstrom=3AGillian_M=3A=3A. DOI https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Open Science Collaboration and Sandstrom, GM (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251). creators-Sandstrom=3AGillian_M=3A=3A. DOI https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Open Science Collaboration and Sandstrom, GM (2015) Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349 (6251). creators-Sandstrom=3AGillian_M=3A=3A. DOI https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
Abstract
One of the central goals in any scientific endeavor is to understand causality. Experiments that seek to demonstrate a cause/effect relation most often manipulate the postulated causal factor. Aarts et al. describe the replication of 100 experiments reported in papers published in 2008 in three high-ranking psychology journals. Assessing whether the replication and the original experiment yielded the same result according to several criteria, they find that about one-third to one-half of the original findings were also observed in the replication study.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Open Science Collaboration; Confidence Intervals; Reproducibility of Results; Behavioral Research; Psychology; Research; Research Design; Publishing; Publication Bias; Periodicals as Topic |
Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology Q Science > Q Science (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 15 Nov 2016 11:55 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 17:56 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/17970 |