Antler, YS (2019) No One Likes to Be Second Choice. The Economic Journal, 129 (619). pp. 1119-1138. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12573
Antler, YS (2019) No One Likes to Be Second Choice. The Economic Journal, 129 (619). pp. 1119-1138. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12573
Antler, YS (2019) No One Likes to Be Second Choice. The Economic Journal, 129 (619). pp. 1119-1138. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12573
Abstract
A decision maker wishes to fill a vacancy with a fixed wage. Candidates who are more valuable to the decision maker are less likely to be available. The candidates suffer a disutility from filling the position when they are ranked low on the decision maker’s preference list. However, the decision maker’s preferences are his private information. Therefore, the candidates infer the decision maker’s preference list from information revealed by the number of failed offers. We explore the adverse effect of the social component in the candidates’ preferences on the decision maker’s ability to recruit a suitable candidate.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Social Motives; Interdependent Preferences; Hiring Procedures; Psychological Motives |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 15 Jan 2018 11:50 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2022 13:44 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/21089 |
Available files
Filename: working_paper_sep_before_pub.pdf