Stark, Tobias H and Silber, Henning and Krosnick, Jon A and Blom, Annelies G and Aoyagi, Midori and Belchior, Ana and Bosnjak, Michael and Clement, Sanne Lund and John, Melvin and Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea and Lawson, Karen and Lynn, Peter J and Martinsson, Johan and Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte and Tvinnereim, Endre and Yu, Ruoh-rong (2020) Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures. Sociological Methods and Research, 49 (3). pp. 567-602. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304
Stark, Tobias H and Silber, Henning and Krosnick, Jon A and Blom, Annelies G and Aoyagi, Midori and Belchior, Ana and Bosnjak, Michael and Clement, Sanne Lund and John, Melvin and Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea and Lawson, Karen and Lynn, Peter J and Martinsson, Johan and Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte and Tvinnereim, Endre and Yu, Ruoh-rong (2020) Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures. Sociological Methods and Research, 49 (3). pp. 567-602. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304
Stark, Tobias H and Silber, Henning and Krosnick, Jon A and Blom, Annelies G and Aoyagi, Midori and Belchior, Ana and Bosnjak, Michael and Clement, Sanne Lund and John, Melvin and Jonsdottir, Gudbjorg Andrea and Lawson, Karen and Lynn, Peter J and Martinsson, Johan and Shamshiri-Petersen, Ditte and Tvinnereim, Endre and Yu, Ruoh-rong (2020) Generalization of Classic Question Order Effects Across Cultures. Sociological Methods and Research, 49 (3). pp. 567-602. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124117747304
Abstract
Questionnaire design is routinely guided by classic experiments on question form, wording, and context conducted decades ago. This article explores whether two question order effects (one due to the norm of evenhandedness and the other due to subtraction or perceptual contrast) appear in surveys of probability samples in the United States and 11 other countries (Canada, Denmark, Germany, Iceland, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Sweden, Taiwan, and the United Kingdom; N = 25,640). Advancing theory of question order effects, we propose necessary conditions for each effect to occur, and found that the effects occurred in the nations where these necessary conditions were met. Surprisingly, the abortion question order effect even appeared in some countries in which the necessary condition was not met, suggesting that the question order effect there (and perhaps elsewhere) was not due to subtraction or perceptual contrast. The question order effects were not moderated by education. The strength of the effect due to the norm of evenhandedness was correlated with various cultural characteristics of the nations. Strong support was observed for the form-resistant correlation hypothesis.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | survey methods; questionnaire design; question order effects; cross-cultural; perceptual contrast |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HA Statistics H Social Sciences > HM Sociology |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 04 Sep 2018 11:24 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 16:28 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/21916 |
Available files
Filename: Stark et al 2018.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 3.0