Glowania, Catharina and Plaisier, Myrthe A and Ernst, Marc O and Van Dam, Loes CJ (2020) No need to touch this: Bimanual haptic slant adaptation does not require touch. PLoS One, 15 (7). e0236824-e0236824. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236824
Glowania, Catharina and Plaisier, Myrthe A and Ernst, Marc O and Van Dam, Loes CJ (2020) No need to touch this: Bimanual haptic slant adaptation does not require touch. PLoS One, 15 (7). e0236824-e0236824. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236824
Glowania, Catharina and Plaisier, Myrthe A and Ernst, Marc O and Van Dam, Loes CJ (2020) No need to touch this: Bimanual haptic slant adaptation does not require touch. PLoS One, 15 (7). e0236824-e0236824. DOI https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236824
Abstract
In our daily life, we often interact with objects using both hands raising the question the question to what extent information between the hands is shared. It has, for instance, been shown that curvature adaptation aftereffects can transfer from the adapted hand to the non-adapted hand. However, this transfer only occurred for dynamic exploration, e.g. by moving a single finger over a surface, but not for static exploration when keeping static contact with the surface and combining the information from different parts of the hand. This raises the question to what extent adaptation to object shape is shared between the hands when both hands are used in static fashion simultaneously and the object shape estimates require information from both hands. Here we addressed this question in three experiments using a slant adaptation paradigm. In Experiment 1 we investigated whether an aftereffect of static bimanual adaptation occurs at all and whether it transfers to conditions in which one hand was moving. In Experiment 2 participants adapted either to a felt slanted surface or simply be holding their hands in mid-air at similar positions, to investigate to what extent the effects of static bimanual adaptation are posture-based rather than object based. Experiment 3 further explored the idea that bimanual adaptation is largely posture based. We found that bimanual adaptation using static touch did lead to aftereffects when using the same static exploration mode for testing. However, the aftereffect did not transfer to any exploration mode that included a dynamic component. Moreover, we found similar aftereffects both with and without a haptic surface. Thus, we conclude that static bimanual adaptation is of proprioceptive nature and does not occur at the level at which the object is represented.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Hand; Humans; Touch; Psychomotor Performance; Adaptation, Physiological; Adult; Female; Male; Postural Balance; Touch Perception; Young Adult |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 10 Aug 2020 12:29 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 16:16 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/28375 |
Available files
Filename: journal.pone.0236824.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0