Research Repository

The use of empirically based information when reforming and evaluating judicial review

Sunkin, Maurice (2020) 'The use of empirically based information when reforming and evaluating judicial review.' In: Higgins, Andrew, (ed.) The Civil Procedure Rules At 20. Oxford University Press, UK, 183 - 204. ISBN 9780198863182

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

This chapter traces the availability and use of empirically based evidence relating to judicial review in England and Wales. It considers how such evidence has been used by reformers of judicial review and those concerned to evaluate the effectiveness of reforms. Attitudes to empirical and statistical data have changed significantly since the early 20th century and the chapter traces this change in the context of judicial review. It is structured around the following phases: from the 1930s to the early 1960s which was typified by the absence of empirically based evidence and scepticism amongst legal academics regarding the value of such evidence; from the early 1960s to the mid-1980s during which the value of empirical evidence on judicial review emerged; the 1980s to the mid-2000s which saw a significant growth in the available empirical evidence; and finally, the period from the mid-2000s during which empirical and statistical evidence took centre stage when governments used statistically based justifications for limiting access to judicial review.

Item Type: Book Section
Uncontrolled Keywords: judicial review, access to justice, empirical evidence, legal reform, evaluating reform
Divisions: Faculty of Humanities > Law, School of
Depositing User: Elements
Date Deposited: 25 Nov 2020 10:26
Last Modified: 25 Nov 2020 11:15
URI: http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/28961

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item