Marique, Yseult (2022) Public and Private Sovereign Powers in Liberal Models of Property Protection -- Belgium, Sweden, and The Netherlands. In: Procedural Requirements for Administrative Limits to Property Rights. The Common Core of European Administrative Law (1). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 276-286. ISBN 9780191904356. Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/44544/chapter-abstra...
Marique, Yseult (2022) Public and Private Sovereign Powers in Liberal Models of Property Protection -- Belgium, Sweden, and The Netherlands. In: Procedural Requirements for Administrative Limits to Property Rights. The Common Core of European Administrative Law (1). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 276-286. ISBN 9780191904356. Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/44544/chapter-abstra...
Marique, Yseult (2022) Public and Private Sovereign Powers in Liberal Models of Property Protection -- Belgium, Sweden, and The Netherlands. In: Procedural Requirements for Administrative Limits to Property Rights. The Common Core of European Administrative Law (1). Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 276-286. ISBN 9780191904356. Official URL: https://academic.oup.com/book/44544/chapter-abstra...
Abstract
This chapter compares the protection of private property from direct and indirect expropriation in three liberal systems: Belgium, Sweden, and the Netherlands. Focusing on these liberal systems, the chapter highlights how deeply expropriation lies at the crossroads between different areas of public law (eg constitutional law, fundamental law, and general administrative law); private law (eg property as a right); and mixed fields (eg environment and planning law). Despite an overall system protecting property rights against administrative arbitrariness at a rather similar level, many technical compromises and concrete solutions are reached via different routes, highlighting variations in preferences in liberal systems to curtail administrative powers: Belgium provides fragmented answers as it relies heavily on judge-made law in addition to its federalised system, whereas the Netherlands sequences the administrative process, compartmentalising it in fairly watertight stages where environmental plans and expropriation are kept separate, and Sweden addresses issues pertaining to expropriation topic by topic.
| Item Type: | Book Section |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | direct expropriation, indirect expropriation, property protection, Belgium, Sweden, the Netherlands |
| Subjects: | K Law > KZ Law of Nations |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Essex Law School |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 23 Dec 2025 15:44 |
| Last Modified: | 23 Dec 2025 15:44 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/30702 |
Available files
Filename: Public and Private Sovereign Powers in Liberal Models of Property Protection -Belgium, Sweden, and The Netherlands AAM.pdf