Gleditsch, Kristian and Gartzke, Erik A (2022) Ties that Bias in International Conflict A Spatial Approach to Dyadic Dependence from Alliance Ties and Inbetweenness. International Studies Quarterly, 66 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab082
Gleditsch, Kristian and Gartzke, Erik A (2022) Ties that Bias in International Conflict A Spatial Approach to Dyadic Dependence from Alliance Ties and Inbetweenness. International Studies Quarterly, 66 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab082
Gleditsch, Kristian and Gartzke, Erik A (2022) Ties that Bias in International Conflict A Spatial Approach to Dyadic Dependence from Alliance Ties and Inbetweenness. International Studies Quarterly, 66 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1093/isq/sqab082
Abstract
Much of international behavior is linked spatially and temporally. Yet, analyses of interstate interactions generally either assume independence among units or resort to technical solutions to dependence that “throw away” relevant information. We detail a more informative and satisfying approach to modeling spatial dependence from extradyadic linkages in alliance ties and geographical proximity as specific pathways of conflict contagion. Beyond deterrence, the purpose of alliances is to draw other parties into dyadic contests, but most existing research on conflict onset generally only considers alliance ties within an individual dyad or external intervention in the same dispute. We develop new measures on third- and fourth-party alliance ties, demonstrating direct and indirect spatial effects of alliances on conflict onset. Similarly, ongoing contests can spread geographically, but dyads in some locations are much more at risk for conflict onset than others. We provide a new theory of geographic “inbetweenness” in conflict, and show that dyads involving specific locations and ties to ongoing conflict are much more likely to see dispute onset, even accounting for other purely dyadic factors. Beyond the intrinsic interest in the impacts of extra-dyadic position and alliances on conflict, our spatial approach can be applied more broadly to other extra-dyadic ties.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Government, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 30 Sep 2021 13:10 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 16:54 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/31193 |
Available files
Filename: sqab082.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0