Boukhennoufa, Issam and Zhai, Xiaojun and Utti, Victor and Jackson, Jo and McDonald-Maier, klaus (2022) Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 71 (B). p. 103197. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197
Boukhennoufa, Issam and Zhai, Xiaojun and Utti, Victor and Jackson, Jo and McDonald-Maier, klaus (2022) Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 71 (B). p. 103197. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197
Boukhennoufa, Issam and Zhai, Xiaojun and Utti, Victor and Jackson, Jo and McDonald-Maier, klaus (2022) Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 71 (B). p. 103197. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197
Abstract
A cerebrovascular accident or stroke is the second commonest cause of death in the world. If it is not fatal, it can result in paralysis, sensory impairment and significant disability. Rehabilitation plays an important role to help survivors relearn lost skills and assist them to regain independence and thus ameliorate their quality of life. With the development of technology, researchers have come up with new solutions to assist clinicians in monitoring and assessing their patients; as well as making physiotherapy available to all. The objective of this review is to assess the recent developments made in the field of post-stroke rehabilitation using wearable devices for data collection and machine learning algorithms for the exercises’ evaluation. To do so, PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. Scopus, Lens, PubMed, ScienceDirect and Microsoft academic were electronically searched. Peer-reviewed papers using sensors in post-stroke rehabilitation were included, for the period between 2015 to August 2021. Thirty-three publications that used wearable sensors for patients’ assessment were included. Based on that, we have proposed a taxonomy that divided the assessment systems into three categories namely activity recognition, movement classification, and clinical assessment emulation. Moreover, The most commonly employed sensors as well as the most targeted body–limbs, outcome measures, and study designs are reviewed, in addition to the examination of the machine learning approaches starting from the feature engineering to the classification done. Finally, limitations and potential study directions in the field are presented.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Stroke rehabilitation; Wearable sensors; Machine learning; Feature engineering; Systematic review |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Computer Science and Electronic Engineering, School of Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 03 Nov 2021 12:42 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 20:56 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/31311 |
Available files
Filename: 1-s2.0-S1746809421007941-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0