Leung, CJ and Fosuaah, A and Frerichs, J and Heslin, M and Kabir, T and Lee, TMC and McGuire, P and Meek, C and Mouchlianitis, E and Nath, AS and Peters, E and Shergill, S and Stahl, D and Trotta, A and Yiend, J (2019) A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry, 19 (1). 225-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3
Leung, CJ and Fosuaah, A and Frerichs, J and Heslin, M and Kabir, T and Lee, TMC and McGuire, P and Meek, C and Mouchlianitis, E and Nath, AS and Peters, E and Shergill, S and Stahl, D and Trotta, A and Yiend, J (2019) A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry, 19 (1). 225-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3
Leung, CJ and Fosuaah, A and Frerichs, J and Heslin, M and Kabir, T and Lee, TMC and McGuire, P and Meek, C and Mouchlianitis, E and Nath, AS and Peters, E and Shergill, S and Stahl, D and Trotta, A and Yiend, J (2019) A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis. BMC Psychiatry, 19 (1). 225-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2215-3
Abstract
Background: Cognitive Bias Modification (CBM) has been used successfully as a computer-based intervention in disorders such as anxiety. However, CBM to modify interpretations of ambiguous information relevant to paranoia has not yet been tested. We conducted a qualitative investigation of a novel intervention called CBM for paranoia (CBM-pa) to examine its acceptability in patients with psychosis. Methods: Eight participants with psychosis who completed CBM-pa were identified by purposive sampling and invited for a semi-structured interview to explore the facilitators and barriers to participation, optimum form of delivery, perceived usefulness of CBM-pa and their opinions on applying CBM-pa as a computerised intervention. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis by researchers working in collaboration with service users. Results: Themes emerged relating to participants' perception about delivery, engagement, programme understanding, factors influencing experience, perceived impact and application of CBM-pa. CBM-pa was regarded as easy, straightforward and enjoyable. It was well-accepted among those we interviewed, who understood the procedure as a psychological intervention. Patients reported that it increased their capacity for adopting alternative interpretations of emotionally ambiguous scenarios. Although participants all agreed on the test-like nature of the current CBM-pa format, they considered that taking part in sessions had improved their overall wellbeing. Most of them valued the computer-based interface of CBM-pa but favoured the idea of combining CBM-pa with some form of human interaction. Conclusions: CBM-pa is an acceptable intervention that was well-received by our sample of patients with paranoia. The current findings reflect positively on the acceptability and experience of CBM-pa in the target population. Patient opinion supports further development and testing of CBM-pa as a possible adjunct treatment for paranoia.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Cognitive bias modification; Interpretation bias; Qualitative research; Psychosis; Paranoia |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 25 Apr 2025 09:38 |
Last Modified: | 25 Apr 2025 09:38 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/31551 |
Available files
Filename: A qualitative study of the acceptability of cognitive bias modification for paranoia (CBM-pa) in patients with psychosis.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0