Jones, Emily (2023) Posthuman Feminism and Global Constitutionalism: Environmental Reflections. Global Constitutionalism, 12 (3). pp. 495-509. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000289
Jones, Emily (2023) Posthuman Feminism and Global Constitutionalism: Environmental Reflections. Global Constitutionalism, 12 (3). pp. 495-509. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000289
Jones, Emily (2023) Posthuman Feminism and Global Constitutionalism: Environmental Reflections. Global Constitutionalism, 12 (3). pp. 495-509. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/S2045381721000289
Abstract
There is a need for the field of global constitutionalism to consider a wider array of voices, such as women’s voices and perspectives from the Global South. Here, I argue that global constitutionalism must pay attention not only to a wider array of human perspectives, but also to non-human perspectives and to different understandings of what the law is and can be. Evaluating how international law categorizes the environment and non-human animals as things or objects to be exploited for human needs, I argue that posthuman feminism provides an alternative epistemic frame for rethinking both global constitutionalism and international law.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | posthuman feminism; global constitutionalism; women’s voices; Global South; non-human exploitation |
Divisions: | Faculty of Arts and Humanities Faculty of Arts and Humanities > Essex Law School |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 07 Mar 2022 19:26 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 21:01 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/31662 |
Available files
Filename: posthuman-feminism-and-global-constitutionalism-environmental-reflections.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0