Wakely, Hannah and Radakovic, Ratko and Bateman, Andrew and Simblett, Sara and Fish, Jessica and Gracey, Fergus (2022) Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16. 767367-. DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367
Wakely, Hannah and Radakovic, Ratko and Bateman, Andrew and Simblett, Sara and Fish, Jessica and Gracey, Fergus (2022) Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16. 767367-. DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367
Wakely, Hannah and Radakovic, Ratko and Bateman, Andrew and Simblett, Sara and Fish, Jessica and Gracey, Fergus (2022) Psychometric Properties of the Revised Dysexecutive Questionnaire in a Non-clinical Population. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16. 767367-. DOI https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2022.767367
Abstract
Aims: The aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties of the revised self-rated version of the Dysexecutive Questionnaire (DEX-R) within a non-clinical sample. Methods: The study was hosted online, with 140 participants completing the DEX-R, GAD-2 and PHQ-2. Sixty participants also completed the FrSBe, with 99 additionally completing the DEX-R again 3 weeks later. Correlations with demographic factors and symptoms of anxiety and depression were conducted. Rasch and factor analysis were also used to explore underlying subconstructs. Results: The DEX-R correlated highly with the FrSBe, indicating sound concurrent validity. Internal consistency, split-half reliability and test-retest reliability were excellent. Age and symptoms of depression and anxiety correlated with DEX-R scores, with older age associated with less dysexecutive problems. The Rasch analysis confirmed the multidimensionality of the rating scale, and a three-factor structure was found relating to activation-self-regulatory, cognitive and social-emotional processes. Frequencies of responses on DEX-R items varied, many were not fully endorsed indicating specific relevance of most but not all items to patients. Conclusion: Interpretations of DEX-R ratings of dysexecutive problems should consider mood and individual variation. Systematic comparison of DEX-R responses between healthy and clinical groups could help identify a suitable cut off for dysexecutive symptoms.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | dysexecutive problems, rating scales, validity, reliability, dysexecutive questionnaire-revised |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 12 Sep 2022 18:21 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 19:29 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/33472 |
Available files
Filename: fnhum-16-767367.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0