Whitley, Elise and McCartney, Gerard and Bartley, Mel and Benzeval, Michaela (2022) Examining the impact of different social class mechanisms on health inequalities: A cross-sectional analysis of an all-age UK household panel study. Social Science and Medicine, 312. p. 115383. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115383
Whitley, Elise and McCartney, Gerard and Bartley, Mel and Benzeval, Michaela (2022) Examining the impact of different social class mechanisms on health inequalities: A cross-sectional analysis of an all-age UK household panel study. Social Science and Medicine, 312. p. 115383. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115383
Whitley, Elise and McCartney, Gerard and Bartley, Mel and Benzeval, Michaela (2022) Examining the impact of different social class mechanisms on health inequalities: A cross-sectional analysis of an all-age UK household panel study. Social Science and Medicine, 312. p. 115383. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115383
Abstract
Background Socioeconomic inequalities are well established across health, morbidity and mortality measures. Social class theory describes how social groups relate, interact and accrue advantages/disadvantages relative to one another, with different theorists emphasising different dimensions. In the context of health inequalities, different social class measures are used interchangeably to rank population groups in terms of health rather than directly exploring the role of social class in creating inequalities. We aim to better understand how four distinct social class mechanisms explain differences in a range of self-reported and biological health outcomes. Methods We use data from the UK Household Longitudinal Study, a representative population survey of UK adults, to identify measures pertaining to Early years, Bourdieusian, Marxist, and Weberian social class mechanisms. Using logistic and least-squares regression we consider the relative extent to which these mechanisms explain differences in health (Self-reported health, SF12 Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Scores, General Health Questionnaire; N = 21,446) and allostatic load, a biomarker-based measure of cumulative stress (N = 5003). Results Respondents with higher social position according to all social class measures had better self-rated, physical and mental health, and lower allostatic load. Associations with Marxist social class were among the strongest (e.g. Relative Index of Inequality for very good/excellent self-rated health comparing highest versus lowest Marxist social class: 4.96 (4.45, 5.52), with the Weberian measure also strongly associated with self-rated (4.35 (3.90, 4.85)) and physical health (Slope Index of Inequality for SF12-PCS: 7.94 (7.39, 8.48)). Health outcome associations with Bourdieusian and Marxist measures were generally stronger for women and older respondents, and physical health associations with all measures were stronger among those aged 50+ years. Conclusions The impact of social class on health is multi-faceted. Policies to reduce health inequalities should focus more on unequal capital ownership, economic democracy and educational inequalities, reflecting Marxist and Weberian mechanisms.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Cross-Sectional Studies; Social Class; Socioeconomic Factors; Adult; Female; Health Status Disparities; United Kingdom |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 26 Sep 2022 15:12 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 20:58 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/33524 |
Available files
Filename: 1-s2.0-S027795362200689X-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 3.0