Corina, David P and Coffey-Corina, Sharon and Pierotti, Elizabeth and Bormann, Brett and LaMarr, Todd and Lawyer, Laurel and Backer, Kristina C and Miller, Lee M (2022) Electrophysiological Examination of Ambient Speech Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65 (9). pp. 3502-3517. DOI https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00004
Corina, David P and Coffey-Corina, Sharon and Pierotti, Elizabeth and Bormann, Brett and LaMarr, Todd and Lawyer, Laurel and Backer, Kristina C and Miller, Lee M (2022) Electrophysiological Examination of Ambient Speech Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65 (9). pp. 3502-3517. DOI https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00004
Corina, David P and Coffey-Corina, Sharon and Pierotti, Elizabeth and Bormann, Brett and LaMarr, Todd and Lawyer, Laurel and Backer, Kristina C and Miller, Lee M (2022) Electrophysiological Examination of Ambient Speech Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 65 (9). pp. 3502-3517. DOI https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_jslhr-22-00004
Abstract
Purpose: This research examined the expression of cortical auditory evoked potentials in a cohort of children who received cochlear implants (CIs) for treatment of congenital deafness (n = 28) and typically hearing controls (n = 28). Method: We make use of a novel electroencephalography paradigm that permits the assessment of auditory responses to ambiently presented speech and evaluates the contributions of concurrent visual stimulation on this activity. Results: Our findings show group differences in the expression of auditory sensory and perceptual event-related potential components occurring in 80- to 200-ms and 200- to 300-ms time windows, with reductions in amplitude and a greater latency difference for CI-using children. Relative to typically hearing children, current source density analysis showed muted responses to concurrent visual stimulation in CI-using children, suggesting less cortical specialization and/or reduced responsiveness to auditory information that limits the detection of the interaction between sensory systems. Conclusion: These findings indicate that even in the face of early interventions, CI-using children may exhibit disruptions in the development of auditory and multisensory processing.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Humans; Deafness; Acoustic Stimulation; Cochlear Implantation; Cochlear Implants; Speech; Speech Perception; Evoked Potentials, Auditory; Child |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Language and Linguistics, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 18 Jul 2023 12:23 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 20:52 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/35454 |