Arthur, Megan and Saha, Ria and Kapilashrami, Anuj (2023) Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: A systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness. Journal of Global Health, 13. 04034-. DOI https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.04034
Arthur, Megan and Saha, Ria and Kapilashrami, Anuj (2023) Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: A systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness. Journal of Global Health, 13. 04034-. DOI https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.04034
Arthur, Megan and Saha, Ria and Kapilashrami, Anuj (2023) Community participation and stakeholder engagement in determining health service coverage: A systematic review and framework synthesis to assess effectiveness. Journal of Global Health, 13. 04034-. DOI https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.13.04034
Abstract
Background Community and stakeholder involvement in decision-making to determine publicly-funded health services and interventions is advocated to fulfil citizens' rights and improve health outcomes. The inclusion of public actors, particularly disadvantaged populations, in priority setting for universal health coverage (UHC) is also enshrined in guidance from the World Health Organization (WHO). However, challenges remain in operationalising this policy aim and ensuring that these approaches are effective and equitable. This study aimed to synthesise published evidence on the role of community and stakeholder participation in determining health service coverage. Methods A systematic review was conducted, searching the Web of Science, Ovid Global Health, and PubMed Central databases from 2000 onwards, including all study types. A framework synthesis approach was used for charting and synthesising data on mechanisms, effectiveness (equity, depth, and stage), and barriers and facilitators for engagement. Results Twenty-seven relevant studies were identified that involve community actors and other stakeholders in priority setting and decision-making processes for defining health benefit packages and UHC, health technology assessment, and pharmaceutical coverage. Mechanisms of engagement include a wide variety of consultation approaches; participation in decision-making committees, advisory councils, and local planning meetings; and appeals mechanisms. Participation occurs primarily at Data and Dialogue stages of decision-making processes, and we found limited depth of engagement among identified cases. Limited consideration of equity was observed in planning and reporting on community involvement in priority setting. A number of challenges are identified in the literature, which we typologise as institutional, procedural, technical, and structural / normative barriers to meaningful participation. Conclusions This systematic review identifies key gaps and opportunities in the literature and practice related to effective and equitable community and stakeholder participation in determining health service coverage. It offers essential considerations for planning and executing inclusive approaches to priority setting for publicly-funded health services and interventions and defining health benefit packages for UHC.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Community Participation; Health Services; Humans; Stakeholder Participation |
Subjects: | Z Bibliography. Library Science. Information Resources > ZZ OA Fund (articles) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 20 Jul 2023 11:44 |
Last Modified: | 07 Aug 2024 20:16 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/35685 |
Available files
Filename: jogh-13-04034.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0