Politics of fiscal discipline: counter-conducting the World Bank’s public financial management reforms

Purpose The World Bank-sponsored public financial management reforms attempt to instil fiscal discipline through techno-managerial package& Taking Ghana's Integrated Financial Management Information System (IFMIS) as a case, this paper explores how and why local actors engaged in counter-conduct against these reforms. Design/methodology/approach Interviews, observations, and documentary analyses on the operationalisation of IFMIS constitute this paper's empirical basis. Theoretically, the paper draws on Foucauldian notions of governmentality and counter-conduct. Findings Empirics demonstrate how and why politicians and bureaucrats enacted ways of escaping, evading, and subverting IFMIS's disciplinary regime. Politicians found the new accounting regime too constraining to their electoral and patronage politics and, therefore, enacted counter-conduct around the notion of political exigencies, creating expansionary fiscal conditions which the World Bank tried to mitigate through IFMIS. Perceiving the new regime as subverting their bureaucratic identity and influence, bureaucrats counter-conducted reforms through questioning, critiquing, and rhetorical venting. Notably, the patronage politics of appropriating wealth and power underpin both these political and bureaucratic counter-conduct& Originality/value This study contributes to the critical accounting understanding of global public financial management reform failures by offering new empirical and theoretical insights as to how and why politicians and bureaucrats who are supposed to own and implement them nullify the global governmentality intentions of fiscal disciplining through subdued forms of resistance.