Mialon, Mélissa and Serodio, Paulo Matos and Crosbie, Eric and Teicholz, Nina and Naik, Ashka and Carriedo, Angela (2024) Conflicts of interest for members of the US 2020 dietary guidelines advisory committee. Public Health Nutrition, 27 (1). e69-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980022000672
Mialon, Mélissa and Serodio, Paulo Matos and Crosbie, Eric and Teicholz, Nina and Naik, Ashka and Carriedo, Angela (2024) Conflicts of interest for members of the US 2020 dietary guidelines advisory committee. Public Health Nutrition, 27 (1). e69-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980022000672
Mialon, Mélissa and Serodio, Paulo Matos and Crosbie, Eric and Teicholz, Nina and Naik, Ashka and Carriedo, Angela (2024) Conflicts of interest for members of the US 2020 dietary guidelines advisory committee. Public Health Nutrition, 27 (1). e69-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s1368980022000672
Abstract
Objectives To measure incidence of conflicts of interest (COI) with food and pharmaceutical industry actors on the advisory committee for the 2020-2025 US Dietary Guidelines for Americans (DGA) and assess the adequacy of current mechanisms to disclose and manage COI among the committee's members. Design We compiled longitudinal data from archival sources on connections between members of the DGA's advisory committee and actors. We hypothesised that these committee members, who oversee the science for the most influential dietary policy in the USA, might have significant COI that would be relevant to their decision making. Disclosure of COI on this committee was recommended in 2017 by the National Academies of Sciences in order to increase transparency and manage bias, but public disclosure of the committee's COI does not appear to have taken place. Setting The committee was composed of twenty experts. Participants None. Results Our analysis found that 95 % of the committee members had COI with the food and/or pharmaceutical industries and that particular actors, including Kellogg, Abbott, Kraft, Mead Johnson, General Mills, Dannon and the International Life Sciences, had connections with multiple members. Research funding and membership of an advisory/executive board jointly accounted for more than 60 % of the total number of COI documented. Conclusions Trustworthy dietary guidelines result from a transparent, objective and science-based, process. Our analysis has shown that the significant and widespread COI on the committee prevent the DGA from achieving the recommended standard for transparency without mechanisms in place to make this information publicly available.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Dietary guidelines; Conflicts of interest; Commercial determinants of health |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 01 May 2024 12:38 |
Last Modified: | 16 May 2024 21:17 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/37404 |
Available files
Filename: conflicts-of-interest-for-members-of-the-us-2020-dietary-guidelines-advisory-committee.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0