Bald, Caroline (2024) "We are open, the door is just very heavy" - the politicization of social work education admissions decision-making in England. In: The Oxford Handbook of Power, Politics and Social Work. Oxford University Press, pp. 447-460. ISBN 978-0197650899. Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197650899.013... (In Press)
Bald, Caroline (2024) "We are open, the door is just very heavy" - the politicization of social work education admissions decision-making in England. In: The Oxford Handbook of Power, Politics and Social Work. Oxford University Press, pp. 447-460. ISBN 978-0197650899. Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197650899.013... (In Press)
Bald, Caroline (2024) "We are open, the door is just very heavy" - the politicization of social work education admissions decision-making in England. In: The Oxford Handbook of Power, Politics and Social Work. Oxford University Press, pp. 447-460. ISBN 978-0197650899. Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197650899.013... (In Press)
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>The professionalization agenda in English social work seemed complete when registration came into being in 2000 under the oversight of the General Social Care Council. Since 2005, anyone using the title “social worker” must be registered, and failure to adhere to regulatory standards risks removal from the register. Two decades and two regulatory bodies later, the interrelationship between social work and politics remains as contested. Where one might have anticipated the professionalization agenda to have satisfied power, it has in effect achieved the opposite, with growing demands to further standardize, validate, and regulate the profession. This chapter considers social work education admissions decision-making as illusio praxis, a politically constructed site of power within social work education as a gateway to the profession. Using a political discourse analysis, this chapter posits that far from emancipation, the populist professionalization movement has colonized social work for politically presented commonsense ends. Through a logic of construction analysis, this chapter exposes a moralizing gray area when considering whose capital counts in meeting “suitability” to study social work. In conclusion, it will be possible to question the ethical presumption of professionalization as modernization or populist mission creep reasserting labor power and claiming new sites of capitalism.</jats:p>
Item Type: | Book Section |
---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 25 Mar 2024 16:58 |
Last Modified: | 08 Jan 2025 17:09 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/37947 |
Available files
Filename: Final Amendments Chapter, The Oxford Handbook of Power.pdf
Embargo Date: 1 November 2026