Hart, Peter D and Asiamah, Nestor and Teferi, Getu and Uher, Ivan (2023) Relationships between physical activity and other health-related measures using state-based prevalence estimates. Health Promotion Perspectives, 13 (4). pp. 308-315. DOI https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.36
Hart, Peter D and Asiamah, Nestor and Teferi, Getu and Uher, Ivan (2023) Relationships between physical activity and other health-related measures using state-based prevalence estimates. Health Promotion Perspectives, 13 (4). pp. 308-315. DOI https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.36
Hart, Peter D and Asiamah, Nestor and Teferi, Getu and Uher, Ivan (2023) Relationships between physical activity and other health-related measures using state-based prevalence estimates. Health Promotion Perspectives, 13 (4). pp. 308-315. DOI https://doi.org/10.34172/hpp.2023.36
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both physical activity and muscle-strengthening activity have known relationships with other health-related variables such as alcohol and tobacco use, diet, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this study was to explore and quantify the associations between physical activity measures and health-related variables at the higher state level. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used data from the 2017 and 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. State-based prevalence (%) estimates were computed for meeting physical activity guidelines (PA), meeting muscle-strengthening activity guidelines (MS), both PA and MS (MB), drinking alcohol (D1), heavy alcohol drinking (HD), fruit consumption (F1), vegetable consumption (V1), good self-rated health (GH), overweight (OW), obesity (OB), current smoking (SN), and smokeless tobacco use (SL). Descriptive statistics, correlation coefficients, and data visualization methods were employed. RESULTS: Strongest associations were seen between PA and F1 (2017: r=0.717 & 2019: r=0.695), MS and OB (2017: r=-0.781 & 2019: r=-0.599), PA and GH (2017: r=0.631 & 2019: r=0.649), PA and OB (2017: r=-0.645 & 2019: r=-0.763), and MB and SN (2017: r=-0.713 & 2019: r=-0.645). V1 was associated only with PA (2017: r=0.335 & 2019: r=0.357) whereas OW was not associated only with PA. Canonical correlation analysis showed the physical activity variables were directly related (r c=0.884, P<0.001) to the health variables. CONCLUSION: This study used high-level data to support the many known relationships between PA measures and health-related variables.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Behavioral risk factor surveillance system; Health behavior; Muscle stretching exercises; Obesity; Physical activity |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 20 Apr 2026 15:09 |
| Last Modified: | 20 Apr 2026 15:09 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38073 |
Available files
Filename: Relationships between physical activity and other health-related measures using state-based prevalence estimates.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0