Pekrun, Reinhard (2024) Overcoming Fragmentation in Motivation Science: Why, When, and How Should We Integrate Theories? Educational Psychology Review, 36 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09846-5
Pekrun, Reinhard (2024) Overcoming Fragmentation in Motivation Science: Why, When, and How Should We Integrate Theories? Educational Psychology Review, 36 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09846-5
Pekrun, Reinhard (2024) Overcoming Fragmentation in Motivation Science: Why, When, and How Should We Integrate Theories? Educational Psychology Review, 36 (1). DOI https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09846-5
Abstract
Theories in motivation science, and in psychological science more generally, are in a state of fragmentation that impedes development of a robust body of knowledge. Furthermore, fragmentation hinders communication among scientists, with practitioners, and with policymakers and the public. Theoretical integration is needed to overcome this situation. In this commentary, I first provide an overview of the integrative frameworks presented in this collection of articles. Based on this overview, I discuss if and when we should integrate theories. Several non-trivial conditions need to be met for integration, including convergence of phenomena, constructs, and theoretical propositions. Next, I address strategies for integration, including rules for merging constructs and ways to integrate propositions. I also discuss how the generation of integrative frameworks, if not successfully enacted, can paradoxically lead to further proliferation rather than a reduction of theories. In contrast, successful integration reduces redundancy and simplifies the conceptual space used to describe, explain, or predict a set of phenomena. Successful integration may require not only theoretical work but also empirical validation, strategic efforts in the scientific community, and change of institutional policies. In conclusion, I argue that within-discipline integration alone is not sufficient to overcome the current theoretical stagnation in the field. Attention to advances in neighboring disciplines, formalization of models of motivation, and theoretical differentiation to consider the specificity of constructs, populations, and contexts are needed as well.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Motivation; Emotion; Theoretical integration; Achievement goal theory; Expectancy-value theory; Control-value theory; Self-determination theory |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 12 Apr 2024 12:02 |
Last Modified: | 12 Apr 2024 12:02 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38193 |
Available files
Filename: s10648-024-09846-5-1.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0