Grugan, Michael C and Olsson, Luke F and Vaughan, Robert S and Madigan, Daniel J and Hill, Andrew P (2024) Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 73. p. 102638. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102638
Grugan, Michael C and Olsson, Luke F and Vaughan, Robert S and Madigan, Daniel J and Hill, Andrew P (2024) Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 73. p. 102638. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102638
Grugan, Michael C and Olsson, Luke F and Vaughan, Robert S and Madigan, Daniel J and Hill, Andrew P (2024) Factorial validity and measurement invariance of the Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ). Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 73. p. 102638. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2024.102638
Abstract
The Athlete Burnout Questionnaire (ABQ) is the gold standard measure for burnout in athletes. However, previous assessments of factorial validity have: (a) tested overly restrictive measurement models; (b) provided mixed support for factorial validity; and (c) not been applied to assess measurement invariance across gender, sport type, or age. To address these issues, we used ABQ data provided by 914 athletes (M<sub>age</sub> = 21.75 years, SD = 8.79) and examined factorial validity using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory structural equation modelling (ESEM) techniques. We also examined measurement invariance of the ABQ data across reported gender (female, male), sport type (individual, team), and age (≤18 years, >18 years) groups. The analyses revealed that an ESEM model provided superior fit over the corresponding CFA model. In terms of measurement invariance, support was provided for the equivalence of the ABQ across each group. This means that researchers using the ABQ can collect data across these groups and examine potential differences with confidence that the ABQ is approximately invariant. In all, we provide evidence that the majority of ABQ items are key target construct indicators and the burnout construct (as measured by the ABQ) has the same structure and meaning to different athlete groups.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Athlete burnout; Psychometrics; Factorial validity; Measurement invariance |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 19 Apr 2024 13:47 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 21:09 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38228 |
Available files
Filename: 1-s2.0-S1469029224000499-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0