Grotz, Jurgen and Armstrong, Lindsay and Edwards, Heather and Jones, Aileen and Locke, Michael and Smith, Laurel and Speed, Ewen and Birt, Linda (2024) Pandemic policymaking affecting older adult volunteers during and after the COVID-19 public health crisis in the four nations of the UK. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 25 (2). pp. 122-131. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-11-2022-0067
Grotz, Jurgen and Armstrong, Lindsay and Edwards, Heather and Jones, Aileen and Locke, Michael and Smith, Laurel and Speed, Ewen and Birt, Linda (2024) Pandemic policymaking affecting older adult volunteers during and after the COVID-19 public health crisis in the four nations of the UK. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 25 (2). pp. 122-131. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-11-2022-0067
Grotz, Jurgen and Armstrong, Lindsay and Edwards, Heather and Jones, Aileen and Locke, Michael and Smith, Laurel and Speed, Ewen and Birt, Linda (2024) Pandemic policymaking affecting older adult volunteers during and after the COVID-19 public health crisis in the four nations of the UK. Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 25 (2). pp. 122-131. DOI https://doi.org/10.1108/qaoa-11-2022-0067
Abstract
Purpose This study aims to critically examine the effects of COVID-19 social discourses and policy decisions specifically on older adult volunteers in the UK, comparing the responses and their effects in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland, providing perspectives on effects of policy changes designed to reduce risk of infection as a result of COVID-19, specifically on volunteer involvement of and for older adults, and understand, from the perspectives of volunteer managers, how COVID-19 restrictions had impacted older people’s volunteering and situating this within statutory public health policies. Design/methodology/approach The study uses a critical discourse approach to explore, compare and contrast accounts of volunteering of and for older people in policy, and then compare the discourses within policy documents with the discourses in personal accounts of volunteering in health and social care settings in the four nations of the UK. This paper is co-produced in collaboration with co-authors who have direct experience with volunteer involvement responses and their impact on older people. Findings The prevailing overall policy approach during the pandemic was that risk of morbidity and mortality to older people was too high to permit them to participate in volunteering activities. Disenfranchising of older people, as exemplified in volunteer involvement, was remarkably uniform across the four nations of the UK. However, the authors find that despite, rather than because of policy changes, older volunteers, as part of, or with the help of, volunteer involving organisations, are taking time to think and to reconsider their involvement and are renewing their volunteer involvement with associated health benefits. Research limitations/implications Working with participants as co-authors helps to ensure the credibility of results in that there was agreement in the themes identified and the conclusions. A limitation of this study lies in the sampling method, as a convenience sample was used and there is only representation from one organisation in each of the four nations. Originality/value The paper combines existing knowledge about volunteer involvement of and for older adults.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Well-being, UK, NHS, Volunteering, Ageing, Health and social care, Pandemic, Devolved policy |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 14 May 2024 08:12 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 21:21 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38377 |
Available files
Filename: QAOA-11-2022-0067.pdf