Juanchich, Marie and Oakley, Claire M and Sayer, Hazel and Holford, Dawn Liu and Bruine de Bruin, Wändi and Booker, Cara and Chadborn, Tim and Vallee-Tourangeau, Gaëlle and Wood, Reed and Sirota, Miroslav (2024) Vaccination invitations sent by warm and competent medical professionals disclosing risks and benefits increase trust and booking intention and reduce inequalities between ethnic groups. Health Psychology, 43 (10). pp. 718-729. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001385
Juanchich, Marie and Oakley, Claire M and Sayer, Hazel and Holford, Dawn Liu and Bruine de Bruin, Wändi and Booker, Cara and Chadborn, Tim and Vallee-Tourangeau, Gaëlle and Wood, Reed and Sirota, Miroslav (2024) Vaccination invitations sent by warm and competent medical professionals disclosing risks and benefits increase trust and booking intention and reduce inequalities between ethnic groups. Health Psychology, 43 (10). pp. 718-729. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001385
Juanchich, Marie and Oakley, Claire M and Sayer, Hazel and Holford, Dawn Liu and Bruine de Bruin, Wändi and Booker, Cara and Chadborn, Tim and Vallee-Tourangeau, Gaëlle and Wood, Reed and Sirota, Miroslav (2024) Vaccination invitations sent by warm and competent medical professionals disclosing risks and benefits increase trust and booking intention and reduce inequalities between ethnic groups. Health Psychology, 43 (10). pp. 718-729. DOI https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0001385
Abstract
Objective: We aim to identify vaccination invitations that foster trust and improve vaccination uptake overall, especially among ethnic minority groups who are more at risk from coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and less likely to be vaccinated. Method: In a preregistered 4 × 4 mixed-design experiment, we manipulated how much risk–benefit information the message included within-subjects and the message source between-subjects (N = 4,038 U.K. and U.S. participants, 50% ethnic minority). Participants read four vaccine invitations that varied in vaccination risk–benefit information (randomized order): control (no information), benefits only, risk and benefit, and risk and benefit that mentions vulnerable groups. The messages were sent by one of four sources (random allocation): control (health institution), medical professional (unnamed), warm and competent medical professional (unnamed), and named warm and competent medical professional (Sanjay/Lamar). Participants assessed how much they trusted the message and how likely they would be to book their vaccination appointment. Results: Information about vaccination benefits and risks increased trust, especially among ethnic minority groups—for whom the effect replicated within each group. Trust also increased when the message was sent by a warm and competent medical professional relative to a health institution, but the importance of the source mattered less when more information was shared. Conclusions: Our research demonstrates the positive impact of outlining the benefits and disclosing the risks of COVID vaccines in vaccination invitation messages. Having a warm and competent medical professional source can also increase trust, especially where the message is limited in scope.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | COVID-19 vaccination, trust, ethnic minority groups, digital communication, risks and benefits |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of Faculty of Social Sciences > Government, Department of Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Social and Economic Research |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jul 2024 13:33 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 21:06 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/38405 |
Available files
Filename: 2024-93958-001.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0