Brogan, Samuel P and Evans, David W and Howe, Louis and McManus, Christopher and Mei, Qichang and Liew, Bernard XW (2025) The relationship between fear of movement and ankle biomechanical strategies in a 180° change of direction task. Gait & Posture, 118. pp. 39-44. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.029
Brogan, Samuel P and Evans, David W and Howe, Louis and McManus, Christopher and Mei, Qichang and Liew, Bernard XW (2025) The relationship between fear of movement and ankle biomechanical strategies in a 180° change of direction task. Gait & Posture, 118. pp. 39-44. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.029
Brogan, Samuel P and Evans, David W and Howe, Louis and McManus, Christopher and Mei, Qichang and Liew, Bernard XW (2025) The relationship between fear of movement and ankle biomechanical strategies in a 180° change of direction task. Gait & Posture, 118. pp. 39-44. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2025.01.029
Abstract
Objective: To assess the association between fear of movement and ankle biomechanics and timed performance in a 505 agility change of direction (COD) test, and to assess the association between the biomechanical indices with timed performance. Methods: Twenty participants, who play football at a university level or higher, with a history of ankle injuries were recruited. All participants performed three maximal effort 505 agility COD tests. Three-dimensional ankle range of motion (ROM, measured using inertial measurement units) and the average ankle muscle co-activation (tibialis anterior, soleus, and peroneus longus muscles of the affected limb, measured using bipolar surface electromyography) were extracted from the stance phase of the final cutting step. Fear of movement was assessed using the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia 11-item (TSK-11) questionnaire. Results: TSK-11 significantly correlated with ankle transverse plane ROM: r = -0.53 (95 %CI −0.79 to −0.11), t = -2.63, P = 0.017. There was no significant association between the COD timed performance and the four ankle biomechanical indices. Conclusions: Greater fear of movement may result in a stiffer turning strategy, which may reduce the risk of injury to the ankle. However, fear of movement is less likely to moderate ankle kinematic and muscle activation strategies that give rise to a performance-injury conflict.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Ankle; Biomechanics; Fear; Football; Agility; Change of direction |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 29 Aug 2025 10:35 |
Last Modified: | 29 Aug 2025 10:36 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/40434 |
Available files
Filename: 1-s2.0-S0966636225000293-main.pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0