Matanov, Aleksandra and McNamee, Philip and Akther, Syeda and Barber, Nick and Bird, Victoria (2021) Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians. BMC Psychiatry, 21 (1). 263-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03256-5
Matanov, Aleksandra and McNamee, Philip and Akther, Syeda and Barber, Nick and Bird, Victoria (2021) Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians. BMC Psychiatry, 21 (1). 263-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03256-5
Matanov, Aleksandra and McNamee, Philip and Akther, Syeda and Barber, Nick and Bird, Victoria (2021) Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression: views of service users and clinicians. BMC Psychiatry, 21 (1). 263-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03256-5
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Treating chronic depression represents a significant burden for the NHS, yet there is a lack of evidence-based interventions and research specifically focused on this condition. DIALOG+, a technology-assisted and resource-oriented intervention found effective for people with psychosis, may improve care for this service user group. The aim of this study was to explore the acceptability and relevance of DIALOG+ for the treatment of chronic depression in community-based settings. METHODS: A convenience sample of 16 mental health professionals and 29 service users with chronic depression tested the DIALOG+ intervention in routine community care appointments for 3 months across 3 different mental health NHS Trusts in England. Of these, 15 clinicians and 19 service users were individually interviewed about their experiences. Interview transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis by an analytic team which included a service user researcher. RESULTS: Analysis of the combined dataset identified five overarching themes: DIALOG+ Structure; Therapeutic Communication; Reflecting and Monitoring; Empowerment and Powerlessness; and The Impact of Technology. Overall, service users and clinicians were interested in the continued use of DIALOG+ as part of routine care. CONCLUSIONS: DIALOG+ was viewed as acceptable by both service users with chronic depression and their clinicians who work in community care settings, albeit with some caveats. Clinician training required significant improvements to address the issues that were referenced, most notably around support with using technology.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | Community Mental Health Services; Depression; England; Humans; Psychotic Disorders; Technology; Chronic depression; Community mental health; DIALOG+; Digital intervention; Solution-focused |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Health and Social Care, School of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 27 Feb 2026 10:58 |
| Last Modified: | 27 Feb 2026 10:58 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/42173 |
Available files
Filename: Acceptability of a technology-supported and solution-focused intervention (DIALOG+) for chronic depression views of service .pdf
Licence: Creative Commons: Attribution 4.0