Coles, Melvyn G and Hildreth, Andrew KG (2000) Wage Bargaining, Inventories, and Union Legislation. Review of Economic Studies, 67 (2). pp. 273-293. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00131
Coles, Melvyn G and Hildreth, Andrew KG (2000) Wage Bargaining, Inventories, and Union Legislation. Review of Economic Studies, 67 (2). pp. 273-293. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00131
Coles, Melvyn G and Hildreth, Andrew KG (2000) Wage Bargaining, Inventories, and Union Legislation. Review of Economic Studies, 67 (2). pp. 273-293. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-937x.00131
Abstract
This paper analyses a strategic bargaining game where the firm may or may not be able to sell out of its inventory of finished goods during a strike. Firms and the union are both risk neutral and have the same discount rate. It is shown that the wage equilibrium corresponds to the axiomatic Nash bargaining solution where the threatpoints are the agents' payoffs should bargaining continue indefinitely. We use the 1980 and 1982 Employment Acts to test this theory, interpreting that legislation change as changing the firm's threatpoint but not its bargaining power. This allows us to identify the value of the firm's threatpoint post-1982. Formal tests support the theory. Also consistent with the theory, it is found that union wages decrease with inventories after 1982, but not before, and that the union wage gap is smaller after 1982. © Oxford University Press 2001.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jan 2013 12:47 |
Last Modified: | 04 Dec 2024 06:12 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/4891 |