Keefer, Philip and Neumayer, Eric and Plümper, Thomas (2011) Earthquake Propensity and the Politics of Mortality Prevention. World Development, 39 (9). pp. 1530-1541. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.010
Keefer, Philip and Neumayer, Eric and Plümper, Thomas (2011) Earthquake Propensity and the Politics of Mortality Prevention. World Development, 39 (9). pp. 1530-1541. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.010
Keefer, Philip and Neumayer, Eric and Plümper, Thomas (2011) Earthquake Propensity and the Politics of Mortality Prevention. World Development, 39 (9). pp. 1530-1541. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.02.010
Abstract
Governments can significantly reduce earthquake mortality by enforcing quake-proof construction regulation. We examine why many governments do not. First, mortality is lower in countries with higher earthquake propensity, where the payoffs to investments in mortality prevention are greater. Second, the opportunity costs of these investments are higher in poorer countries; mortality is correspondingly less responsive to propensity in poor countries. Third, mortality is higher at any level of quake propensity when governments have fewer incentives to provide public goods, such as in autocracies with less institutionalized ruling parties or in more corrupt countries.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster; mortality; political economy; democracy; risk; public goods |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) K Law > K Law (General) T Technology > TH Building construction |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Government, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 30 Apr 2013 12:01 |
Last Modified: | 05 Dec 2024 11:45 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/6072 |