Nunan, David and Sandercock, Gavin RH and George, Robert S and Jakovljevic, Djordje G and Donovan, Gay and Bougard, Robert and Yacoub, Magdi H and Brodie, David A and Birks, Emma J (2013) Cardiovascular autonomic control in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and pharmacologic therapy. International Journal of Cardiology, 168 (4). pp. 4145-4149. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.075
Nunan, David and Sandercock, Gavin RH and George, Robert S and Jakovljevic, Djordje G and Donovan, Gay and Bougard, Robert and Yacoub, Magdi H and Brodie, David A and Birks, Emma J (2013) Cardiovascular autonomic control in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and pharmacologic therapy. International Journal of Cardiology, 168 (4). pp. 4145-4149. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.075
Nunan, David and Sandercock, Gavin RH and George, Robert S and Jakovljevic, Djordje G and Donovan, Gay and Bougard, Robert and Yacoub, Magdi H and Brodie, David A and Birks, Emma J (2013) Cardiovascular autonomic control in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support and pharmacologic therapy. International Journal of Cardiology, 168 (4). pp. 4145-4149. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2013.07.075
Abstract
Objectives The objective of the study is to determine cardiac autonomic control in patients undergoing assessment for and/or LVAD therapy. Methods Heart rate variability (HRV) was measured in 17 explanted LVAD, 17 implanted LVAD and 23 NYHA III-IV classified chronic heart failure (CHF) patients and ten healthy matched controls under three conditions: supine free breathing, standing and supine controlled breathing. Five measures of HRV were assessed: mean R-R interval (mR-R), high frequency (HF) and low frequency (LF) spectral power, LF in normalised units (LFnu), and LF to HF (LF:HF) ratio. Results Repeat measures ANOVA showed significant (p < 0.05) differences in HRV between all three conditions within groups. Lower values were observed in CHF for LF(in log natural units) compared with explanted patients (- 1.4 [95% CI - 2.6 to - 0.7], p = 0.04) and controls (- 2.1 [- 3.5 to - 0.7], p = 0.001) and for LF:HF compared with implanted patients under paced breathing conditions (z = - 2.7, p = 0.007) and controls in standing (z = - 2.9, p = 0.004) and paced breathing conditions (z = - 2.3, p = 0.02). However, no significant differences were seen between explanted, implanted and control groups under any condition. Conclusions Patients implanted with an LVAD and explanted from a LVAD following myocardial recovery demonstrate a more normal dynamic response to autonomic stimuli and have a lower HRV risk profile compared to CHF patients. © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Bridge-to-recovery; Reverse remodelling; Heart rate variability; Normalisation; Prognosis |
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RD Surgery |
Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health Faculty of Science and Health > Sport, Rehabilitation and Exercise Sciences, School of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 16 Sep 2013 08:35 |
Last Modified: | 30 Oct 2024 20:12 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/7729 |
Available files
Filename: IJC_LVAD 2013.pdf