Gartzke, Erik and Lupu, Yonatan (2012) Still Looking for Audience Costs. Security Studies, 21 (3). pp. 391-397. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2012.706486
Gartzke, Erik and Lupu, Yonatan (2012) Still Looking for Audience Costs. Security Studies, 21 (3). pp. 391-397. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2012.706486
Gartzke, Erik and Lupu, Yonatan (2012) Still Looking for Audience Costs. Security Studies, 21 (3). pp. 391-397. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/09636412.2012.706486
Abstract
A pair of recent studies, motivated largely by limitations in the research designs of previous projects, offers evidence the authors interpret as contradicting audience cost theory. Although we share the authors’ ambivalence about audience costs, we are not convinced by their evidence. What one seeks in looking for audience costs is evidence of a causal mechanism, not just of a causal effect. Historical case studies can be better suited to detecting causal mechanisms than quantitative methods, and these two studies claim to be examining causal mechanisms. Yet process tracing is much less effective in assessing audience costs than Trachtenberg and others believe. After outlining relevant problems, we encourage scholars to theorize about and test more carefully key micro-foundations of audience cost theory.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Government, Department of |
SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
Date Deposited: | 16 Jan 2014 10:34 |
Last Modified: | 06 Jan 2022 14:39 |
URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/8628 |
Available files
Filename: SSRN-id2117844.pdf