Rakow, Tim (2014) Self-insight research as (double) model recovery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37 (1). pp. 37-38. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x13000824
Rakow, Tim (2014) Self-insight research as (double) model recovery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37 (1). pp. 37-38. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x13000824
Rakow, Tim (2014) Self-insight research as (double) model recovery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 37 (1). pp. 37-38. DOI https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x13000824
Abstract
<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title><jats:p>Self-insight assessment compares outcomes from two model-recovery exercises: a statistical exercise to infer a judge's (implicit) policy and an elicitation exercise whereby the judge describes his or her (explicit) policy. When these policies are mismatched, limited self-insight is not necessarily implied: Shortcomings in either exercise could be implicated, whereby Newell & Shanks' (N&S's)<jats:italic>relevance</jats:italic>or<jats:italic>sensitivity</jats:italic>criteria for assessing awareness may not be met. Appropriate self-insight assessment requires that both exercises allow the original processes to be captured.</jats:p>
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Additional Information: | Open Peer commentary on: Newell, B.R. & Shanks, D.R. (2014) Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral & Brain Sciences, 37, http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214 |
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science and Health > Psychology, Department of |
| SWORD Depositor: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email elements@essex.ac.uk |
| Date Deposited: | 02 May 2014 14:48 |
| Last Modified: | 24 Oct 2024 11:06 |
| URI: | http://repository.essex.ac.uk/id/eprint/9329 |