Items where Author is "Zarzeczna, Natalia"
 | Up a level |
Article
Zarzeczna, Natalia and Bertlich, Tisa and Rutjens, Bastiaan T and Gerstner, Ida and von Hecker, Ulrich (2024) Space as a mental toolbox in the representation of meaning. Royal Society Open Science, 11 (11). 240985-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.240985
Većkalov, Bojana and Zarzeczna, Natalia and McPhetres, Jonathon and van Harreveld, Frenk and Rutjens, Bastiaan T (2024) Psychological Distance to Science as a Predictor of Science Skepticism Across Domains. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 50 (1). pp. 18-37. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221118184
Hanel, Paul HP and Zarzeczna, Natalia (2023) From multiverse analysis to multiverse operationalisations: 262,143 ways of measuring well-being. Religion, Brain and Behavior, 13 (3). pp. 309-313. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/2153599X.2022.2070259
Leicht, Carola and Sharp, Carissa A and LaBouff, Jordan P and Zarzeczna, Natalia and Elsdon-Baker, Fern (2022) Content Matters: Perceptions of the Science-Religion Relationship. The international journal for the psychology of religion, 32 (3). pp. 232-255. DOI https://doi.org/10.1080/10508619.2021.2003111
Bojana, Većkalov and Zarzeczna, Natalia and Esther, Niehoff and Jonathon, McPhetres and Bastiaan T., Rutjens (2021) A matter of time… consideration of future consequences and temporal distance contribute to the ideology gap in climate change scepticism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 78. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2021.101703
Rutjens, Bastiaan T and van der Linden, Sander and van der Lee, Romy and Zarzeczna, Natalia (2021) A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24 (4). pp. 513-517. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302211009708
Hanel, Paul HP and Zarzeczna, Natalia and Haddock, Geoffrey (2019) Sharing the Same Political Ideology Yet Endorsing Different Values: Left- and Right-Wing Political Supporters Are More Heterogeneous Than Moderates. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 10 (7). pp. 874-882. DOI https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550618803348