Browse by Journal
![]() | Up a level |
Saltsman, Thomas L and Seery, Mark D and Ward, Deborah E and Lamarche, Veronica M and Kondrak, Cheryl L (2021) Is satisficing really satisfying? Satisficers exhibit greater threat than maximizers during choice overload. Psychophysiology, 58 (1). e13705-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13705
Adler, Julia and Gillmeister, Helge (2019) Bodily selfârelatedness in vicarious touch is reflected at early cortical processing stages. Psychophysiology, 56 (12). e13465-. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.13465
Paulmann, Silke and Uskul, Ayse K (2017) Early and late brain signatures of emotional prosody among individuals with high versus low power. Psychophysiology, 54 (4). pp. 555-565. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12812
Seery, MD and Kondrak, CL and Streamer, L and Saltsman, T and Lamarche, VM (2016) Preejection period can be calculated using R peak instead of Q. Psychophysiology, 53 (8). pp. 1232-1240. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/psyp.12657
Forster, Bettina and Gillmeister, Helge (2011) ERP investigation of transient attentional selection of single and multiple locations within touch. Psychophysiology, 48 (6). pp. 788-796. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01147.x
Poli, Riccardo and Cinel, Caterina and Citi, Luca and Sepulveda, Francisco (2010) Reaction-time binning: A simple method for increasing the resolving power of ERP averages. Psychophysiology, 47 (3). pp. 467-485. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00959.x
Hughes, Gethin and Velmans, Max and De Fockert, Jan (2009) Unconscious priming of a noâgo response. Psychophysiology, 46 (6). pp. 1258-1269. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00873.x
Kennett, Steffan and Van Velzen, José and Eimer, Martin and Driver, Jon (2007) Disentangling gaze shifts from preparatory ERP effects during spatial attention. Psychophysiology, 44 (1). pp. 69-78. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00470.x
Croft, Rodney J and Chandler, Jody S and Barry, Robert J and Cooper, Nicholas R and Clarke, Adam R (2005) EOG correction: A comparison of four methods. Psychophysiology, 42 (1). pp. 16-24. DOI https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-8986.2005.00264.x